🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to safeguard females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the vote. The final authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked broad outcry both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 people have signed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could potentially return the legislation for further consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar debates in other EU countries